The Alaska Child Support Laws set forth for the courts and the Child Support Services Division determine the rules for who should pay child support and how much. The guidelines take into account income of each of the parents, health care needs and coverage for the children, educational needs of the children, as well as the employment status of the parents. Modifications can be made if there is a material change in circumstances of the children or the parents.

Alaska Rules

RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Part XII. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS

Rule 90.3. Child Support Awards
[Current through October 15, 2023]

(Current through October 15, 2023)

Rule 90.3. Child Support Awards.

1. Guidelines—Primary Physical Custody. A child support award in a case in which one parent is awarded primary physical custody as defined by paragraph (f) will be calculated as an amount equal to the adjusted annual income of the non- custodial parent multiplied by a percentage specified in subparagraph (a)(2).

1. Adjusted annual income as used in this rule means the parent’s total income from all sources minus:

   1. mandatory deductions such as:

1. 1. 1. federal, state, and local income tax,

1. 1. 2. Social Security tax or the equivalent contribution to an alternate plan established by a public employer, and self- employment tax,

1. 1. 3. medicare tax,

1. 1. 1. mandatory union dues,

      2. mandatory contributions to a retirement or pension plan;

   2. voluntary contributions to a retirement or pension plan or account in which the earnings are tax-free or tax-deferred, except that the total amount of these voluntary contributions plus any mandatory contributions under item (a)(1)(A)(v) above may not exceed 7.5% of the parent’s gross wages and self-employment income;

   3. child or spousal support from different relationships for

1. 1. 1. prior children that is required by other court or administrative proceedings; and

      2. former spouses that is required by other court or administrative proceedings and actually paid:

   2. in-kind support for prior children in the primary or shared physical custody of the parent that is:

1. 1. 1. for primary custody, the amount calculated under subparagraph (a)(2); or

1. 1. 1. for shared custody, the amount calculated under subparagraph (a)(2), multiplied by the percentage of time that parent has physical custody of the prior children; however, the total amount deducted under this sub-item and any deduction for the same children under item (a)(1)(C) may not exceed the amount calculated under subparagraph (a)(2);

   2. work-related child care expenses for the children who are the subject of the child support order; and

1. 1. health insurance premiums paid for health insurance coverage, including dental and vision coverage, by the parent and for the parent only, except that the total amount of these premiums may not exceed 10% of the parent’s gross wages and self-employment income.

2. The percentage by which the non-custodial parent’s adjusted income must be multiplied in order to calculate the

child support award is:

1. 1. 20% (.20) for one child;

1. 2. 27% (.27) for two children;

1. 3. 33% (.33) for three children; and

1. 4. an extra 3% (.03) for each additional child.

3. The court may allow the obligor parent to reduce child support payments by up to 75% for any period in which the obligor parent has extended visitation of over 27 consecutive days. The order must specify the amount of the reduction which is allowable if the extended visitation is exercised.

4. Potential Income. The court may calculate child support based on a determination of the potential income of a parent who voluntarily and unreasonably is unemployed or underemployed. A determination of potential income may not be made for a parent who is physically or mentally incapacitated, or who is caring for a child under two years of age to whom the parents owe a joint legal responsibility. Potential income will be based upon the parent’s work history, qualifications, and job opportunities. The court also may impute potential income for non-income or low income producing assets.

2. Shared, Divided, and Hybrid Physical Custody.

1. Shared Physical Custody. A child support award in a case in which the parents are awarded shared physical custody as defined by paragraph (f) will be calculated by:

   1. Calculating the annual amount each parent would pay to the other parent under paragraph (a) assuming the other parent had primary custody. In this calculation the income limit in subparagraph (c)(2) and the minimum support amount in subparagraph (c)(3) apply.

   2. Multiplying this amount for each parent by the percentage of time the other parent will have physical custody of the children. However, if the court finds that the percentage of time each parent will have physical custody will not accurately reflect the ratio of funds each parent will directly spend on supporting the children, the court shall vary this percentage to reflect its findings.

1. 3. The parent with the larger figure calculated in the preceding subparagraph is the obligor parent and the annual award is equal to the difference between the two figures multiplied by 1.5. However, if this figure is higher than the amount of support which would be calculated under paragraph (a) assuming primary custody, the annual support is the amount calculated under paragraph (a).

   4. The child support award is to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments except as follows:

1. if shared custody is based on the obligor parent having physical custody for periods of 30 consecutive days or more, the total annual award may be paid in equal installments over those months in which the obligor parent does not have physical custody; or

2. if the obligor parent’s income is seasonal, the court may order unequal monthly support payments as provided in

subparagraph (c)(5).

1. 5. The child support order must state that failure to exercise sufficient physical custody to qualify for shared physical custody under this rule is grounds for modification of the child support order. Denial of visitation by the custodial parent is not cause to increase child support.

2. Divided Physical Custody. A child support award in a case in which the parents have divided custody is calculated, first, by determining what each parent would owe the other for children in that parent’s primary physical custody under paragraph (a), taking into account the income limit in subparagraph (c)(2) and the minimum support amount in subparagraph (c)(3), and offsetting those amounts. Second, because divided custody is an “unusual circumstance,” the court must consider whether this support amount should be varied under subparagraph (c)(1).

3. Hybrid Physical Custody. A child support award in a case in which the parents have hybrid custody is calculated by applying paragraph (a), taking into account the income limit in subparagraph (c)(2) and the minimum support amount in subparagraph (c)(3), to determine support for children in the primary physical custody of each parent and applying subparagraph (b)(1) to determine support for children in the shared physical custody of the parents. In these calculations, the sub-paragraph (a)(2) percentages must be adjusted pro rata based on the number of children in each type of custody. These results are then combined to determine the net obligation. Finally, because hybrid custody is an “unusual circumstance,” the court must consider whether this support amount should be varied under subparagraph (c)(1).

3. Exceptions.

1. The court may vary the child support award as calculated under the other provisions of this rule for good cause upon proof by clear and convincing evidence that manifest injustice would result if the support award were not varied. The court must specify in writing the reason for the variation, the amount of support which would have been required but for the variation, and the estimated value of any property conveyed instead of support calculated under the other provisions of this rule. Good cause may include a finding that unusual circumstances exist which require variation of the award in order to

award an amount of support which is just and proper for the parties to contribute toward the nurture and education of their

children. The court shall consider the custodial parent’s income in this determination.

2. Paragraph (a) does not apply to the extent that the parent has an adjusted annual income of over $126,000. In such a case, the court may make an additional award only if it is just and proper, taking into account the needs of the children, the standard of living of the children and the extent to which that standard should reflect the supporting parent’s ability to pay.

3. The minimum child support amount that may be ordered is $50 per month ($600 per year) except as provided in subparagraph (a)(3) and paragraph (b).

4. In addition to ordering a parent to pay child support as calculated under this rule, the court may, in appropriate circumstances, order one or more grandparents of a child to pay child support to an appropriate person in an amount determined by the court to serve the best interests of the child. However, the amount may not exceed the smaller of (A) a proportionate share of the amount required to provide care in a supervised setting to the grandchild, as determined by the court, or (B) the amount that would have been awarded if the child’s parents had the incomes of the child’s grandparents and paragraphs (a) and (b) were applied. An order under this paragraph may be issued only with respect to a child whose parents are both minors, and the order terminates when either parent becomes 18 years of age. The court must specify in writing the reasons why it considers it to be appropriate to order a grandparent to pay child support under this paragraph and the factors considered in setting the amount of the child support award. In this paragraph, “grandparent” means the natural or adoptive parent of the minor parent.

5. If the non-custodial parent’s income is seasonal, the court may order that the annual support amount be paid in unequal monthly payments, with higher payments during the months the parent expects to receive higher income and lower payments in other months. The court should not make such an order unless (a) it finds that the burden of budgeting for periods of unequal income should be placed on the obligee rather than the obligor and (b) the obligee agrees. The court’s order must specify the annual support amount, the average monthly support amount, and the amount due month by month. The order must provide that variations from the average monthly amount begin with monthly payments in excess of the average monthly amount such that a deficit situation cannot occur. Until the excess payments begin, the average monthly amount must be ordered.

4. Health Care Coverage.

1. 1. Health Insurance.

1. The court shall address coverage of the children’s health care needs and require health insurance for the children if insurance is available to either parent at a reasonable cost and accessible to the children. The court shall consider whether the children are eligible for services through the Indian Health Service (or any other entity) or other insurance coverage before ordering either or both parents to provide health care coverage through insurance or other means.

   1. Reasonable Cost. There is a rebuttable presumption that the cost of health insurance is reasonable if the cost does not exceed five percent of the adjusted annual income of the parent who may be required to purchase the insurance.

1. 1. Accessible. Health insurance is accessible to the children if the plan pays for health care services reasonably available to the children.

2. The court shall allocate equally the cost of this insurance between the parties unless the court orders otherwise for good cause. An obligor’s child support obligation will be decreased by the amount of the obligee’s portion of health insurance payments ordered by the court and actually paid by the obligor. A child support award will be increased by the obligor’s portion of health insurance if the obligee is ordered to, and actually does obtain and pay for insurance.

3. The cost of insurance is the cost attributable to the children for whom support is paid. If the cost to the employee of covering the employee alone is the same as the cost to the employee of covering the employee and dependents, then there is no additional cost to the employee for adding the children and no portion of the cost of coverage may be allocated to the children. If dependent coverage can be added for a single cost, rather than per dependent, and the dependent coverage covers dependents in addition to the children subject to the order, the cost of the dependent coverage will be allocated equally among the dependents covered. If there is reason to believe that there is an incremental cost to the employee for insuring dependents but evidence of that incremental cost is unavailable, the cost of insurance is determined by dividing the total cost of coverage by the number of family members covered and multiplying that amount by the number of children subject to the order.

1. 2. Uncovered Health Care Expenses. The court shall allocate equally between the parties the cost of reasonable health care expenses not covered by insurance unless the court orders otherwise for good cause. A party shall reimburse the other party for his or her share of the uncovered expenses within 30 days of receipt of the bill for the health care, payment verification, and, if applicable, a health insurance statement indicating what portion of the cost is uncovered. Reasonable, uncovered expenses exceeding $5,000 in a calendar year will be allocated based on the parties’ relative financial circumstances when the expenses occur.

5. Child Support Affidavit and Documentation.

1. Subject to the confidentiality requirements of Civil Rule 90.1(f), each parent in a court proceeding at which child support is involved must file a statement under oath which states the parent’s adjusted annual income and the components of this income as provided in subparagraph (a)(1). This statement must be filed with a party’s initial pleading (such as the dissolution petition, divorce complaint or answer, etc.), motion to modify, and any response to a motion to modify. The statement must be accompanied by documentation verifying the income. The documents must be redacted to delete social security numbers and to provide only partial financial account information as provided in Civil Rule 90.1(f). The statement must state whether the parent has access to health insurance for the children and, if so, the additional cost to the parent of the children’s health insurance. For any infraction of these rules, the court may withhold or assess costs or attorney’s fees as the circumstances of the case and discouragement of like conduct in the future may require; and such costs and attorney’s fees may be imposed upon offending attorneys or parties.

2. While there is an ongoing monthly support obligation, either party must provide to the other party, within 30 days of a written request, documents such as tax returns and pay stubs showing the party’s income for the prior calendar year. The party making the request must provide documentation of his or her annual income for the same period at the time the request is made. A request under this section may not be made more than once per year. This section does not preclude discovery under other civil rules.

3. Unless the information has already been provided to the court under Civil Rule 90.1(f), a statement under subsection (e)(1) of this rule must be accompanied by a confidential information sheet as described in Civil Rule 90.1(f). Once a complete confidential information sheet has been submitted to the court listing names, dates of birth, and social security numbers as required, the parties shall omit or redact social security numbers from documents subsequently filed in the action unless otherwise ordered by the court. This paragraph applies to documents filed with the court on or after October 15, 2006.

6. Definitions.

1. Shared Physical Custody. A parent has shared physical custody (or shared custody) of children for purposes of this rule if the children reside with that parent for a period specified in writing in the custody order of at least 30, but no more than 70, percent of the year, regardless of the status of legal custody.

2. Primary Physical Custody. A parent has primary physical custody (or primary custody) of children for purposes of this rule if the children reside with the other parent for a period specified in the custody order of less than 30 percent of the year.

3. Divided Custody. Parents have divided custody under this rule if one parent has primary physical custody of one or more children of the relationship and the other parent has primary custody of one or more other children of the relationship, and the parents do not share physical custody of any of their children.

4. Hybrid Custody. Parents have hybrid custody under this rule if at least one parent has primary physical custody of one or more children of the relationship, and the parents have shared physical custody of at least one child of the relationship.

5. Health Care Expenses. Health care expenses include medical, dental, vision, and mental health counseling expenses.

7. Travel Expenses. After determining an award of child support under this rule, the court shall allocate reasonable travel expenses which are necessary to exercise visitation between the parties as may be just and proper for them to contribute.

8. Modification.

1. Material Change of Circumstances. A final child support award may be modified upon a showing of a material change of circumstances as provided by state law. A material change of circumstances will be presumed if support as

calculated under this rule is more than 15 percent greater or less than the outstanding support order. For purposes of this paragraph, support includes health insurance payments made pursuant to (d)(1) of this rule.

2. No Retroactive Modification. Child support arrearage may not be modified retroactively, except as allowed by AS 25.27.166(d). A modification which is effective on or after the date that a motion for modification, or a notice of petition for modification by the Child Support Services Division, is served on the opposing party is not considered a retroactive modification.

3. Preclusion. The court may find that a parent and a parent’s assignee are precluded from collecting arrearages for support of a child that accumulated during a time period exceeding nine months for which the parent agreed or acquiesced to the obligor exercising primary custody of the child. A finding that preclusion is a defense must be based on clear and convincing evidence.

(i) Third Party Custody.

1. When the state, or another third party entitled to child support, has custody of all children of a parent, the parent’s support obligation to the third party is an amount equal to the adjusted annual income of the parent multiplied by the percentage specified in subparagraph (a)(2). If the third party has custody of some but not all children, the parent’s support obligation to the third party is an amount equal to the adjusted annual income of the parent, multiplied by the percentage specified in subparagraph (a)(2) for the total number of the parent’s children, multiplied by the number of the parent’s children in third party custody, divided by the total number of the parent’s children. For purposes of this paragraph, the number of the parent’s children only includes children of the parent who live with the parent, are substantially supported by the parent or who are in custody of the third party entitled to support.

2. If, in addition to a support obligation to a third party, one or both parents retain primary or shared physical custody of at least one of their children, the support obligation between the parents is calculated pursuant to the other paragraphs of this rule, without consideration of the third party custodian or any children in the custody of the third party custodian, except that the percentage in 90.3(a)(2) must be adjusted pro rata for the number of children in the primary custody of a parent, or shared custody of the parents, compared to the total number of children. After that calculation is completed, any support owed may be offset with support owed to a third party custodian under the preceding subparagraph in order to minimize transactions.

10. Support Order Forms. All orders for payment or modification of child support shall be entered on a form developed by the administrative director. A party may lodge a duplicate of the court form produced by a laser printer or similar device. A device may also print, in a contrasting typestyle equivalent to that produced by a typewriter, text that otherwise would have been entered by a typewriter or word processor. A party or attorney who lodges a duplicate certifies by lodging the duplicate that it is identical to the current version of the court form.

10. Dependent Tax Deduction. The court may allocate the dependent tax deduction for each child between the parties

as is just and proper and in the child’s best interests. The allocation must be consistent with AS 25.24.152 and federal law.

(Adopted by SCO 833 effective August 1, 1987; amended by SCO 935 effective January 15, 1989; by SCO 1008 effective

January 15, 1990; by SCO 1192 effective July 15, 1995; by SCO 1246 effective July 15, 1996; by SCO 1269 effective July

15, 1997; by SCO 1295 effective January 15, 1998; by SCO 1362 effective October 15, 1999; by SCO 1399 effective

October 15, 2000; by SCO 1417 effective April 15, 2001; by SCO 1526 effective April 15, 2005; by SCO 1595 effective

October 15, 2006; by SCO 1686 effective April 15, 2009; by SCO 1716 effective July 1, 2009; by SCO 1782 effective

October 15, 2013; by SCO 1800 effective October 15, 2013; by SCO 1919 effective April 16, 2018; and by ScO 1939 effective nunc pro tunc September 13, 2018)

Note: This rule is adopted under the supreme court’s interpretive authority pursuant to Article IV, Section I of the Alaska Constitution. Thus, it may be superseded by legislation even if the legislation does not meet the procedural requirements for changing rules promulgated under Article IV, Section 15.

Note to Civil Rule 90.3(c)(1)(B): The Federal Poverty Guidelines are usually revised each February. The new poverty income guideline for one person in Alaska in 1999 is $10,320 (Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 52, 13428–13430, March 18, 1999). The Alaska Supreme Court has indicated that the poverty guideline that should be used is the guideline for the state in which the obligor resides. See Carstens v. Carstens, 867 P.2d 805, 810 (Alaska 1994).

Note to Civil Rule 90.3(h)(1): Section 44 of ch. 87 SLA 1997 amended AS 25.24.170(b) to allow support to be modified without a showing of a material change in circumstances as necessary to comply with federal law. Federal law eliminates the need for a showing only in cases being enforced by CSED that are being reviewed under CSED’s periodic

review and modification program. According to § 152 of ch. 87 SLA 1997, the amendment to AS 25.24.170(b) has the effect of amending Civil Rule 90.3 by changing the standard for certain modifications of a support order.

Note to Civil Rule 90.3(h)(2): AS 25.27.166(d), enacted by § 14 of ch. 57 SLA 1995, has the effect of amending Civil Rule 90.3(h)(2) by allowing retroactive modification of child support arrearage under circumstances involving disestablishment of paternity, to the extent such modification is not prohibited by federal law.

Note: Civil Rule 90.3(c)(3) was added by § 44 ch, 107 SLA 1996. Section 22 of ch. 107 SLA 1996 enacts 25.27.195(b), which allows CSED to vacate an administrative support order that was based on a default amount rather than the obligor’s actual ability to pay. If an order is vacated on this basis, AS 25.27.195(d) allows the agency to modify the obligor’s arrearages under the original order. According to § 50 ch. 107 SLA 1996, AS 25.27.195(d) has the effect of amending Rule 90.3(h)(2), which prohibits retroactive modification of child support arrearages.

Note: Section 41 of ch. 87 SLA 1997 amends AS 25.20.050 relating to paternity actions. According to § 150 of the Act,

§ 41 has the effect of amending Civil Rule 90.3 by requiring the court in a paternity action to issue a temporary child support order upon a showing by clear and convincing evidence of paternity.

Note: Chapter 106 SLA 2000 amends various laws relating to medical support orders. According to section 24 of the act, the act amends Civil Rule 90.3 “by specifying that a medical support order may be issued even when a support order for periodic monetary payments is not issued and by setting the requirements for medical support orders.”

Note: Chapter 108 SLA 04 (HB 514) enacted several amendments to the child support statutes, including a provision that permits periodic modifications of a child support order without a showing of materially changed circumstances. According to Section 17 of the Act, statutory modifications to AS 25.27.190(e) have the effect of amending Civil Rule 90.3 by changing the grounds for modifying a support order.

Note (effective nunc pro tunc to July 1, 2009): Chapter 45 SLA 2009 (SB 96), effective July 1, 2009, enacted changes relating to child support, including changes concerning orders for medical support of a child. According to section 13 of the Act, AS 25.27.060(c) as amended by section 4 of the Act, has the effect of changing Civil Rule 90.3 by changing standards for issuance of medical and other support orders by the court.

Note (effective nunc pro tunc September 13, 2018): Chapter 24 SLA 2018 (SB 134) concerned actions for termination of parental rights. According to section 19(a) of the Act, AS 25.23.130(f), enacted by section 6 of the Act, has the effect of amending Civil Rule 90.3 by providing that a termination of parental rights under AS 25.23.180(c)(2), as amended by section 12 of the Act, does not relieve a biological parent of an obligation to pay child support unless the decree specifically provides for the termination of the obligation to pay child support.